Skip to content
VAR controversy mars Germany's World Cup exit as disallowed goalGermany's Jonathan Tah had a goal disallowed in extra time against Paraguay after VAR deemed a soft foul on the goalkeeper. The decision drew sharp criticism from Alan Shearer, Julian Nagelsmann, and Jurgen Klopp, who compared it to goals Arsenal score regularly./images/2026/06/var-controversy-mars-germany-s-world-cup-exit-as-disallowed-goal-c7e4756c-800w.webpVAR controversy mars Germany's World Cup exit as disallowed goal

VAR controversy mars Germany's World Cup exit as disallowed goal

Updated 3 min read
Germany's Jonathan Tah heads the ball towards goal as Paraguay goalkeeper Orlando Gill falls to the ground during a World Cup match.

Short overview

Germany's Jonathan Tah had a goal disallowed in extra time against Paraguay after VAR deemed a soft foul on the goalkeeper. The decision drew sharp criticism from Alan Shearer, Julian Nagelsmann, and Jurgen Klopp, who compared it to goals Arsenal score regularly.

Germany's World Cup campaign ended in bitter controversy after a video assistant referee (VAR) decision disallowed what would have been a crucial extra-time goal, sparking outrage from pundits and the German camp. Defender Jonathan Tah thought he had put Germany ahead 2-1 in the 12th minute of extra time against Paraguay, only for the goal to be ruled out for a foul on the goalkeeper.

The disallowed goal

From a corner kick, Tah rose unmarked at the back post and powered a header across Paraguay goalkeeper Orlando Gill. However, the effort was chalked off after referee Jalal Jayed reviewed the incident on the pitchside monitor. The VAR had recommended the review after Germany's Waldemar Anton was judged to have impeded Gill, who fell to the turf before attempting to save Tah's header.

Reaction from pundits

Former England captain Alan Shearer, commentating on BBC One, called the decision "terrible" and accused the goalkeeper of conning the referee. "I don't agree with that decision at all. The keeper falls to the ground on a slight touch and it's very soft. I thought it was a terrible decision," Shearer said. "You have to understand it is a contact sport, the goalkeeper has conned the referee and the VAR. The way he went down was pathetic."

Former Premier League assistant referee Darren Cann also weighed in, describing the foul as "soft" and "hardly anything." He said: "This is soft, in my opinion. But judging by what we've seen in the tournament so far, it wouldn't surprise me if they do rule it out. We've seen two or three goals ruled out for very small offences. This is hardly anything. It's a small block on the goalkeeper, but for me, it's not enough."

Ex-Scotland winger Pat Nevin, in Boston for BBC Radio 5 Live, agreed that the apparent foul was not clear enough to rule out the goal. "It is mayhem around there. There is a block - has it affected the goalkeeper? It looks like it. It is a subjective call. That is not clear," Nevin said.

Nagelsmann's fury

Germany head coach Julian Nagelsmann was left fuming after the match, which ended 1-1 after extra time, with Paraguay triumphing 4-3 on penalties. "In my opinion, this foul was not a real foul; it was actually a joke that his goal was disallowed," Nagelsmann said. The coach was shown a yellow card for his protests during the game. His future with the national team remains uncertain following the early exit.

Klopp's comparison to Arsenal

Former Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp, working for German television during the World Cup, drew a comparison to Premier League champions Arsenal. "If the goal is illegal, then Arsenal won't be English champions. They've scored 60% of their goals that way," Klopp told MagentaTV. "We [Germany] win the game when the ball goes in. So, of course, this is brutal."

The decision has reignited debate over the use of VAR and the interpretation of fouls on goalkeepers, with many arguing that the contact was minimal and did not warrant overturning the goal.

All Matches

Search